|
We are entitled to our own opinions, but not our own facts. |
|
|
|
Each experimental result paper is assigned to a specific week
on the schedule page.
Two people will be assigned to write and post an evaluation
for each remaining paper.
The summaries should:
(1) describe the problem in general terms,
(2) paraphrase the experimental hypothesis,
(3) summarize and critique the design,
(4) discuss the conduct of the experiment,
(5) explain whether the hypothesis was proved or disproved, and
(6) critique the presentation of the paper.
These summaries will be posted on the bulletin board
on Mondays by close of business
in Sweden Fairfax (6:00 PM EST, or midnight in Sweden).
One student will be designated as "dissenter" for each paper
and is required to disagree with the posted summaries and
provide reasonable arguments.
The dissenter must post the counter-arguments on Tuesday by close of business midnight in Sweden.
All students must join in the discussion for each paper throughout the week. All postings, including dissents, must be courteous and professional!
I. (25%) Participation via the bulletin board is required. All students are expected to participate energetically in the discussions. Discussion postings must have substantial content. Postings such as "I agree with Mats" will not earn credit. Postings such as "Mats thought the number of subjects were too few, but I believe five is enough for this study because ..." will. Students who do not participate in the discussions on a weekly basis will not receive credit for this portion of the grade. Shyness and lack of English proficiency are not valid excuses.
II. (20%) Each student will post summaries and evaluations as described above under PAPERS. I will assign papers to students. You can "bid" on papers by sending me an email and I will try to honor all requests. Depending on the numbers, you will only have two or three papers, and it is imperative that you post your summaries on time.
III. (50%) The experimental project will constitute half the grade, and both the paper and the presentation will be graded. Each student will write and post a short description of the proposed experiment early in the semester and the class will make suggestions for improvements.
IV. (5%) A draft of each paper will be reviewed by three people; the professor and two classmates. We will assign papers for reviews late in the semester.
Skövde grading:
| Top |
© Jeff Offutt, 2012, all rights reserved.
This document is made available for use by students in
software engineering experimentation.
Copying, distribution or other use of this document
without express permission of the author is forbidden.
You may create links to pages in this web site,
but may not copy all or part of the text without permission
of the author.